YES FOLKS, SINCE I WILL BE THERE , AND IN FACT THERE TODAY, I WILL BE (HOPEFULLY), GIVING UPDATES ON BENNETT'S DAY OUT IN COURT.
I WILL TRY TO KEEP IT TO ONE THREAD SO KEEP CHECKING BACK TO LOOK FOR UPDATES.
SO 4TH FEBRUARY ... WELL BENNETT IS IN HIS DARKISH BLUE/BLACK (hard to tell at times), SUIT, WITH HIS BLUE TIE....SERIOUSLY BENNETT YOUR TIE NEEDS TO BE IRONED. HE CERTAINLY LOOKS AS IF HE DOESN'T POSSES AN IRON, AND HE NEEDS A BLOODY GOOD HAIRCUT (AND MAYBE HEAD AND SHOULDERS TO)
ON A SERIOUS NOTE, YES HE LOOKS LIKE HE HAS LOST WEIGHT, BUT WORD COMING OUT IS, IT MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THE WITNESSES TO APPEAR IN THE NEXT TWO DAYS , SO HIS WORRIES MAY BE OVER AS HE COULD BE PLEADING GUILTY TO IT ALL
**UPDATE** 11:56
BENNETT ASKING WHY HE CANNOT SEE LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS ABOUT AMARAL'S CAVE IN AND SETTLEMENT TERMS....HE WAS THAT IT HAS NO BEARING OR HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE AND IT WAS POINTED OUT, YET AGAIN TO HIM, THAT THE PORTUGUESE LAW IS DIFFERENT HERE AND DETAILS OF SETTLEMENT ARE PRIVATE
4 comments:
Why doesn't TB come clean and explain his little outburst about not having received the documents to his home address that he was going on about last week, as nothing more than an excuse he was trying to use to walk away from the whole thing ? So much for his boast of having his day in court.
" Defending Committal Applications in the County Court under Part IV of the Family Law Act 1996 "
"unless he is subsequently served with it in accordance with CCR 1981 Ord 29 rule1A (1). The reason for this is that the rule effectively requires the written undertaking to be delivered to your respondent. Surprisingly, this rule 1 (A)(1) has removed the courts discretion to dispense with delivery/service of the undertaking as it can do with an injunction order under rule 1(7). This gives rise to a chink in the applicant's armour and affords you a potential defence to a committal application for breach of undertaking."
"Therefore if the respondent were to deny a full understanding of the undertaking that he gave to the court, and it could not be proven that he was served with a copy of it, you might have a potential defence against a committal application"
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed812
And he wrote this "Help I have not received my paperwork" In plain view of all the alleged CR snoops on Haverns site... Good job they were looking they soon delivered them in a limo !.
What the hell are you on about, the court case starts tomorrow (5th Feb) you have even written that on your blog further down?!
So, no you nutcase you can't be there, how ridiculous you are!
Oh Good Lord, @above another biblical sheep wandering in the wild I guess.. THE TRIAL STARTS TOMORROW,TODAY WAS THE PRE-TRIAL HEARING .. keep up or was that not written down clearly enough for you? As for nutcases.. your call I think !
Camden is full of cunts.
Post a Comment