1. What career did Mr Amaral have before he led the Madeleine enquiry?
ANSWER: Mr Amaral was an experienced, respected, senior detective. One of his colleagues described him as ‘incorruptible’. He had many successes in bringing drug dealers to justice and in one year netted the biggest haul of illegal drugs of any detective in Portugal. His most famous case was his success in bringing the killers of 8-year-old Joana Cipriano to court and ensuring that they served long jail sentences for their appalling crime
MY REPLY THE ALLEGED COLLEAGUE WAS A FIGMENT OF THE IMAGINATION OF THE FRAUD OF A JOURNALIST CALLED DUARTE LEVY. YES BENNETT THE SAME LEVY EXPOSED AS A FRAUD AND A LEECH BY JOANA MORAIS. SHE ADMITTED THAT LEVY MADE STORIES UP
2. Wasn’t Mr Amaral accused of beating and torturing Joana Cipriano’s mother into making a false confession?
ANSWER: Yes he was. And most unjustly. Joana was reported missing by her mother, only after she had apparently been missing for two days. The sad truth was that Joana had come back from the village shops to find her mother in bed with her uncle. After an intensive investigation led by Mr Amaral, both voluntarily confessed to having brutally murdered her and disposed of her body. Today they are serving 16-year-jail terms for her murder.
WRONG BENNETT. AMARAL WAS NOT ACCUSED OF HER TORTURE. HE WAS ACCUSED OF AND ULTIMATELY FOUND GUILTY OF COVERING UP THE FACT THE BEATINGS HAPPENED AND THAT HE KNEW THAT THEY HAPPENED. ONCE AGAIN YOU SEEM TO BE DISTORTING THE TRUTH BENNETT....REMEMBER IT IS BENNETT SERVING A SUSPENDED SENTENCE FOR PERJURY.....A PROVEN LIAR
3. What about the photos of her in the press showing her with black eyes?
ANSWER: Since being convicted of their crimes, both the mother and the uncle have tried to claim they were beaten by Mr Amaral and his men and forced to confess to something they had not done. However, it is clear that Leonor Cipriano suffered her injuries as a result of a beating by fellow female prisoners after being taken to Odemira Prison. During a recent court case, the Director of Odemira Prison was forced to admit to asking her Prison Medical Director to lie about the cause of Ms Cipriano’s injuries. Ms Cipriano changed her story many times.
AND YOU WANT TO BELIEVE THE WORDS OF LIARS..THE SAME LIARS CONVICTED OF LYING IN A COURT. THESE FEMALE PRISONERS WERE NEVER CAUGHT, NEVER INTERVIEWED AND IN THAT CASE NEVER EXISTED. ALSO IS IT NOT THE CASE AMARAL CLAIMED HER INJURIES WERE BECAUSE SHE FELL DOWN THE STAIRS, NOT ONCE BUT TWICE? HE REALLY NEEDS TO MAKE HIS MIND UP.
4. Why was Mr Amaral removed from the Madeleine investigation?
ANSWER: Shortly before he was removed, he made some ‘off the record’ comments to a Portuguese journalist detailing how the British government was interfering with his investigation. A leading Portuguese newspaper published his remarks, giving the Portuguese authorities an excuse to remove him from the enquiry. As Mr Amaral has set out in a second book, ‘The English Gag’, Prime Minister Gordon Brown was told of his being removed from his post before he was. Mr Amaral has provided evidence of British government interference in his enquiries in his two books on the case. As we have shown elsewhere, the British government heavily influenced this investigation from the outset, sending several top-level people out to Portugal in the first week alone, including staff from MI5. We aim to cover this topic in more detail on our website in the coming months.
EASY ....FAT, LAZY, INCOMPETENT AND USELESS. THAT'S JUST SOME WORDS TO DESCRIBE THE CORRUPT EX INSPECTOR.
NOW BENNETT I TRUST YOU HAVE DETAILED INFORMATION OF MI5 SPY LIST AND WHAT WORK THEY CARRY OUT, THAT'S, I GUESS HOW YOU KNOW THEY WERE THERE.
ACTUALLY THE BRITISH EMBASSY/CONSULATE ONLY STARTED TO GET INVOLVED ONCE THEY KNEW AMARAL WAS IN CHARGE.
5. Wasn’t his enquiry incompetent, as the British news media suggest?
ANSWER: No. As was clear from the interim police report of 10 September 2007, the investigation was severely hampered by overwhelming international media coverage, requiring the police to follow up literally hundreds of false ‘sightings’ of Madeleine. Despite that, the police conducted a meticulous investigation with the help of hundreds of police officers. The interim report was very thorough. We have reproduced the whole of it in our recent book on the case: ‘The Madeleine McCann case Files: Volume 1’, available for purchase from our website.
SORRY JUST PICKED MYSELF OFF THE FLOOR BECAUSE I HAVE JUST LAUGHED SO HARD. THIS MUST BE THE ONLY SENIOR INVESTIGATING OFFICER IN THE WORLD WHO HAS NEVER BEEN TO THE CRIME SCENE, NEVER INTERVIEWED THE SUSPECTS (AS HE SAID) AND PREFERS LONG LIQUID LUNCHES INSTEAD. THE MEDIA WAS FED LIES BY AMARAL'S CAMP AND THAT WAS SAID IN THE FINAL REPORT
6. But isn’t it true that the police failed to secure the crime scene properly?
ANSWER: This is one of many false stories about the Madeleine McCann investigation put about in the British media. What most people do not know is that despite the McCanns and their friends apparently genuinely believing that an abductor had taken Madeleine from her room, they themselves tramped all over the McCanns’ apartment and allowed several others to do so before the police arrived. This contaminated the crime scene, making the Portuguese police’s task much more difficult. In fact, the police sealed the crime scene later that night as soon as they were reasonably able to. The McCanns also criticised Mr Amaral, amongst other things, for never meeting them and never visiting the crime scene. But then the head of any major criminal investigation must be a good delegator. Mr Amaral’s enquiry was also hampered by many inconsistencies in the accounts given by he McCanns and their friends and by the McCanns’ refusal to disclose certain information such as their telephone, credit card and medical records.
THE McCANNS ARE NOT CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATORS. MANY PEOPLE WOULD HAVE ACTED THE SAME, NOT THINKING OF PRESERVING A CRIME SCENE. HOW MANY PEOPLE IF BURGLED WOULD LOOK FOR ITEMS STOLEN WHILST WAITING FOR THE POLICE? EVERYONE WOULD YET THAT IS INTERFERING WITH A CRIME SCENE. THE HEAD OF A MAJOR CRIME WILL ALWAYS VISIT THE CRIME SCENE, BUT THEN LAW IS MOT YOUR STRONG POINT IS IT BENNETT
AS FOR INCONSISTENCIES YOU AS A PHONEY SOLICITOR SHOULD BE AWARE THAT NO TWO STATEMENTS SHOULD BE THE SAME. IF THEY ARE IT IS STRONG EVIDENCE THAT THEY HAVE COLLUDED TOGETHER TO MAKE A STORY UP. ALL SOLICITORS AND BARRISTERS KNOW THAT. THEY EVEN KNOW THAT PEOPLE CHANGE THEIR MINDS FROM THE FIRST STATEMENTS AS MORE FACTS COME TO THEM OR LEAVE THEM.
7. Is it true that Mr Amaral and his publishers have made £1 million from the sale of Mr Amaral’s book?
ANSWER: Yes. We must remember that in trying to bring us the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Mr Amaral gave up his job many years ahead of his normal retirement date, thus losing huge amounts of both salary and pension entitlement. The McCanns threatened to sue Mr Amaral and his publishers for libel when his book. ‘The Truth About A Lie’, was first published in July 2008. But they did nothing about it until over a year later, by which time his book had sold over half a million copies across Europe. The McCanns have never explained why they waited for over a year to take action, but they are now claiming the £1 million profits the book has made. As a result of the McCanns’ libel action, Mr Amaral’s book has been banned from sale in Portugal since September 2009.
AMARAL LEFT BY HIS OWN ACCORD AND HAD ALREADY STARTED WRITING HIS OWN BOOK BEFORE HE LEFT HIS JOB. WHAT KIND OF SENIOR INVESTIGATING OFFICER DOES THAT? A INCOMPETENT ONE. THE McCANNS BY LAW DO NOT HAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT (LIBEL) STRAIGHT AWAY. THEY ARE ENTITLED TO WAIT. MAYBE THEY BELIEVED AMARAL WOULD JUST SHUT UP
8. Was Mr Amaral convicted of filing a false report in the Cipriano case?
ANSWER: Yes. However, he has appealed, and under Portuguese law his sentence, a suspended prison term of 18 months, cannot take effect until his appeal is heard. He was found not guilty of any suggestion of being involved in the alleged beating of Leonor Cipriano and her brother. On the basis of precious little evidence, he was found guilty of ‘filing a false report’ about the case. There are many indications that Mr Amaral’s trial was politically motivated. In this connection we would commend our article on the prosecutor in this case, Mr Marcos Correia. We have a lengthy investigative article about him on our website.
YES A CONVICTED LIAR...AMARAL'S APPEAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN HEARD BY NOW, BUT IT WAS NOT LODGED.
. What kind of help and support does Mr Amaral need?
ANSWER: His most urgent need is for financial help towards the huge costs of his legal expenses for defending the McCanns’ libel action and the various unjust criminal charges bring levelled against him. It is very easy to support him; his representative Mr Paulo Sargento has created a website to give practical help to him. You can donate by PayPal.
EVEN BENNETT SAID HE DID NOT NEED HELP AND HAS DISTANCED HIMSELF FROM BENNETT, AS HE REALISES BENNETT IS DOING HIM NO FAVOURS WHATSOEVER. PAULO SARGENTO IS ANOTHER FRAUD IN THIS CASE.
So Bennett provide clear, strong RELIABLE evidence please next time.
No comments:
Post a Comment