Re: 'muratfan' and my father - a new low for 'muratfan'?
candyfloss wrote:
jkh wrote:Damn. muratfan's blog was the only one I read lately.
How am I gonna know when CR writes to me now?
Ask him if you can borrow his now redundant crystal ball.You know the one, the one that predicts everything wrong.
Actually, he was never that far off.......
Just goes to show that he was in contact
Re: 'muratfan' and my father - a new low for 'muratfan'?
This was sent to one's mailbox some moments ago and it rather looks as if muratfan has realised he has been somewhat recalcitrant and in so doing has storing up trouble for himself by pretending to have been in the bosom of 'the world's most feared libel lawyers'.
It is of course nonsense to suggest that Tony Bennett, The Madeleine Foundation or anybody else for that matter, are at any risk for merely asking that this case continue to be investigated. It is quite ludicrous that somebody would go out on a limb to spout such scaremongering rhetoric. One has still yet to be made aware of any libel whatsoever. The only libel one has seen to date has been that of the fanatical converts from yesteryear.
muratfan:
''Bennett Released The Foundation E-Mails On PURPOSE
REMEMBER WHEN BENNETT, BY ACCIDENT, SENT OUT EVERYONE'S E-MAIL ADDRESSES ON A E-MAIL TO ALL MEMBERS?
WELL THERE WAS ONE OR TWO E-MAIL ADDRESSES MISSING FROM THE LIST, NAMELY THOSE OF LAWYERS WORKING FOR CARTER RUCK. BENNETT HAS SOLD YOU DOWN THE RIVER TRYING TO SAVE HIS OWN SKIN. SO ASK YOURSELVES FOUNDATION MEMBERS THIS QUESTION.
WILL YOU SUPPORT BENNETT ONCE YOU KNOW THIS FACT.....THOSE PEOPLE BACKING HIM AND PROVIDING MONIES YOU ARE LIABLE FOR BENNETT WHEN CARTER RUCK WIN THE FORTHCOMING CASE AND WIN DAMAGES. PROBLEM IS THOSE BACKERS WILL BE ASKED TO MAKE UP THE SHORTFALL.
IT IS THE WAY IT GOES I AM AFRAID.
0 comments Links to this post Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
why Did I Not Know Bradford Had A Carter Ruck Letter?
Must admit i did not know, but then somethings i delete from my inbox without reading them first. However i do know Havern has had letters, as obviously Bennett has had.
It is of course nonsense to suggest that Tony Bennett, The Madeleine Foundation or anybody else for that matter, are at any risk for merely asking that this case continue to be investigated. It is quite ludicrous that somebody would go out on a limb to spout such scaremongering rhetoric. One has still yet to be made aware of any libel whatsoever. The only libel one has seen to date has been that of the fanatical converts from yesteryear.
muratfan:
''Bennett Released The Foundation E-Mails On PURPOSE
REMEMBER WHEN BENNETT, BY ACCIDENT, SENT OUT EVERYONE'S E-MAIL ADDRESSES ON A E-MAIL TO ALL MEMBERS?
WELL THERE WAS ONE OR TWO E-MAIL ADDRESSES MISSING FROM THE LIST, NAMELY THOSE OF LAWYERS WORKING FOR CARTER RUCK. BENNETT HAS SOLD YOU DOWN THE RIVER TRYING TO SAVE HIS OWN SKIN. SO ASK YOURSELVES FOUNDATION MEMBERS THIS QUESTION.
WILL YOU SUPPORT BENNETT ONCE YOU KNOW THIS FACT.....THOSE PEOPLE BACKING HIM AND PROVIDING MONIES YOU ARE LIABLE FOR BENNETT WHEN CARTER RUCK WIN THE FORTHCOMING CASE AND WIN DAMAGES. PROBLEM IS THOSE BACKERS WILL BE ASKED TO MAKE UP THE SHORTFALL.
IT IS THE WAY IT GOES I AM AFRAID.
0 comments Links to this post Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Google Buzz
why Did I Not Know Bradford Had A Carter Ruck Letter?
Must admit i did not know, but then somethings i delete from my inbox without reading them first. However i do know Havern has had letters, as obviously Bennett has had.
Re: 'muratfan' and my father - a new low for 'muratfan'?
Bogus letter then if every one with balls have got this standard letter!
Not difficult to make up letterhead these days what with evolving IT technology.
Come to think of it....both sides can play this silly game isn't it.
Team of professional hackers ......yeah.....it's becoming a hobby for some.
Not difficult to make up letterhead these days what with evolving IT technology.
Come to think of it....both sides can play this silly game isn't it.
Team of professional hackers ......yeah.....it's becoming a hobby for some.
Re: 'muratfan' and my father - a new low for 'muratfan'?
jkh wrote:
kangdang wrote:Oi West, you still haven't blogged about that CR letter I rec'd on the 5th August. Why is that?
How come you rec'd a letter from Carter Ruck and I haven't?
Muratfan says I've rec'd one but I haven't
Stop those tears right now. You are not missing out in any way, for it is only a standard letter asking that we refrain from saying things that to my knowledge have never been written or said by anybody anyway. One will mail one's own copy to you directly. To get the full effect, one would recommend you print off a hard copy onto a very average weight paper. None of your vellum or Basildon Bond mind.
There are some who say these letters may not have actually come from 'the most feared libel lawyers', but were sent by mischievous posters who have found out addresses and merely wish to scare TMF's supporters. PLEASE YOUR MAKING ME LAUGH SO HARD
It is to only to be expected, since we are edging closer every day to the time of the libel trial in Portugal.
Re: 'muratfan' and my father - a new low for 'muratfan'?
kangdang wrote:Having reviewed all thecrapposts in West's new bog it is fairly clear why he renamed and relocated. There are a number of articles missing, many of which contained statements where he purported to be "in the know" & "in cahoots" with C-R. West did NOT close his blog as a hoax, TB's letter to C-R had him running scared - hence the spring clean...a tad too late though I might add. As I was able to compare screenshots of his now defunct site with his latest pile of shite.
Still, what is interesting is that a few posts slipped through the net - derp!
I suggest TB sends C-R the link to West's new blog asap.
There is no hiding place for muratfan and that is quite clear. However, would it be possible for us to prepare a list of their closest known cohorts? The reason one asks, is that few of us seem to read sites such as muratfan's, and therefore only see cut and pastes of his own work, which leaves us at a loss as to whom he is directly collaborating with. Who slaps muratfan's back when he spews his bile? Who are his everyday supporters? He would not write such shocking filth lest he had a longstanding and enthusiastic audience of fans himself.
kangdang wrote:
Explain away West.....
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ianwestphotoenqu@sendfree.com
Delivered-To: incoming@sendfree.com
Received: by sendfree.com (Postfix, from userid 99)
id A357E7C070C; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:45:15 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ianwestphotoenqu@sendfree.com
From: "Ian west" westleggett1972@ntlworld.com
Subject: Signup from your form
Message-Id: <20090911194515.A357E7C070C@sendfree.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:45:15 -0400 (EDT)Return-Path:
X-Original-To: ianwestphotoenqu@sendfree.com
Delivered-To: incoming@sendfree.com
Received: by sendfree.com (Postfix, from userid 99)
id A357E7C070C; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:45:15 -0400 (EDT)
Explain away West.....
err Kangdang/HardLineMarxist/SharonLawrence.....remember this you had to put up on your site?
Ian West the photographer of Bowthorpe, Norwich is NOT Ian M West of 2 Latimer Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 2RW.
Ian West the photographer runs a reputable photographic company.
I would like to offer my sincere apologies to Ian West Photographer for any upset or inconvenience caused to him, his family or his business by my copying and pasting articles from other websites which infer that he is Ian M West of 2 Latimer Road, Norwich, Norfolk, NR1 2RW – He is NOT.
Well not only do you have my name wrong, you also seem to be outing once again the Photographer....look at the address you idiot. sendfree.com is for making online sales....
And since you claim that both people are the same , why are they sending e-mails to themselves???
No comments:
Post a Comment