A full reply to Mickey
Mickey wrote:If there was a suspicion that the McCanns were involved in child abuse they would have been investigated and their children interviewed - we would undoubtedly know about this if it had happened. The fact that it hasn't tends to suggest that those who are best placed to spot signs of abuse (i.e.: the police, CEOP, social services - all of those that have had direct dealings with the McCanns over the last 4 years) have not noticed anything amiss with any of their actions. You'd have to ask yourself why this is the case, why only those speculating on internet forums who have had no direct face-to-face contact with the McCanns have come to a conclusion which none of the professionals have.
It is not quite so simple, Mickey.
If you search the files released by the Portuguese police, they confirm that Leicestershire Police called for a search of the local (Leicestershire) section of the child abuse register and it revealed the registration number 19309 in the CATS (child abuse recording) system against Dr Gerald McCann. This has never been satisfactorily explained.
YOU CLAIM TO BE A SOLICITOR (or even a LAWYER AT TIMES( SO YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT THE REGISTRATION NUMBER IS A SEARCH NUMBER ON THE FILE. THE FACT THE FILE IS EMPTY GIVES IT AWAY THAT THERE IS NO SUGGESTION OF ANY CHILD ABUSE.
YOU REALLY ARE THAT THICK AREN'T YOU BENNETT. YOU REALLY ARE THE WORLDS BIGGEST TWAT
1 comment:
WHY IS THERE A SEARCH NUMBER ON A CATS FILE.THAT IS THE QUESTION?
Post a Comment