http://tony-bennett.org.uk/Barrymore-Forensic-Evidence.htm
AS YOU CAN SEE....AS RESEARCHER (BENNETT) HAS DECIDED TO GUESS MOST THINGS THAT WERE FOUND IN MICHAEL BARRYMORE'S HOUSE.
Saliva on pillowcase, ref AMS/42 – from Simon Shaw and one other. Assumed by the researcher to be Barrymore
Sheet, ref AMS46, Jonathan Kenney and one other, again assumed by the researcher to be that of Barrymore
AS YOU CAN SEE ASSUMPTION IS WHAT BENNETT DOES BEST....HE TRIES (AND FAILS) TO ASSUME HE KNOWS BEST.
NOW LETS FOCUS ON OTHER BITS IN THAT REPORT THAT BENNETT HAS TWISTED TO SUIT IS OWN WARPED SICK AND PERVERTED MIND.
Duvet cover, ref AMS/41 – Jonathan Kenney, Barrymore and one other male (that sample could belong to about 50% of the population) BARRYMORE'S BOYFRIEND AT THE TIME, SO NO SURPRISE THERE.
Bedroom A, Side A of the mattress – Ten areas of semen staining (A1- A10), six bloodstained areas (A-F). Seven out of the 10 semen stains “indicated the presence of DNA from more than one person”, several ‘mixed profiles’ [I am not sure what this means], but no semen from Stuart Lubbock. Two out of the 10 semen stains were from males at the party, one was from BarrymoreLeft side of divan, ref HH5 – body fluids of Barrymore
Bedroom A, Side B of mattress – one semen stain from Barrymore
Bedroom B – Divan, ref HH6 – encrusted body fluids, either semen or blood – Barrymore’s
HOLD THE FRONT PAGE...DNA SAMPLES FOUND IN BED THAT MICHAEL BARRYMORE SLEPT IN...NONE FROM LUBBOCK.
Robe, ref AMS/10 semen on the outside back and the belt, blood on the sleeve and belt; the semen was Barrymore; the blood was not checked
ALL ITEMS WHICH WERE OWNED BY BARRYMORE, WHICH WERE IN HIS OWN HOUSE, WHICH HE SHARED WITH HIS THEN PARTNER
Duvet cover, ref AMS/41 – blood, semen and saliva – the blood was Barrymore’s, the semen Jonathan Kenney’s, and semen stains from another individual but not Stuart Lubbock
Pillowcase, ref AMS/42 – saliva from two people, neither of them Stuart Lubbock
Sheet, ref AMS/42 – semen and saliva from Barrymore and one other individual but not Stuart Lubbock
NOW WE COME TO SOMETHING A BIT MORE REVEALING, AND BEAR IN MIND WHAT THE REPORT SAYS, IT WILL GIVE YOU AN INSIGHT INTO BENNETT'S OWN SICK AND PERVERTED MIND.
Swabs from Stuart Lubbock’ internal body fluids examined from in a variety of samples. No samples showed the presence of DNA material from anyone else.
Boxer shorts – blood and semen stains were not profiled [stated reason: “There was a discrete bloodstain present on the outside fly area of the boxer shorts. There was also an area of semen staining on the inside of the fly. DNA (STR) profiling was not attempted on this item as the location of this staining is not what I would expect as a result of recent sexual intercourse”] (?)
SO NO DNA FROM ANYONE, NO EVIDENCE OF SEXUAL INTERCOURSE ...SO HOW CAN (AS BENNETT PUT) LUBBOCK HAD BEEN FISTED, AND HAD SEX AT THE PARTY, WHEN EVEN THE FORENSICS SAID THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF IT WHATSOEVER..AND WHO SAYS SO...
Conclusion: “In my opinion there is no scientific evidence to indicate that Stuart Lubbock had sexual relations immediately prior to his death”
BENNETT AGAIN USING HIS SICK PERVERTED MIND TO TWIST THINGS
No comments:
Post a Comment